In Mexico, the practice of making arbitrary use of the criminal justice system against people who denounce and investigate human rights violations, and who support the victims of these violations in their search for justice, truth and full compensation for damages has become the norm. This is what Amnesty International Mexico warns in its latest report Persecuted: criminalization of women human rights defenders in Mexico.
The report, released today, documents the cases of lawyer Ana Lorena Delgadillo Pérez, journalist Marcela Turati Muñoz and forensic anthropologist Mercedes Doretti, who were subjected to unlawful investigation and surveillance by the Mexican state for the alleged offences of organized crime and kidnapping.
Involvement of the authorities took place without sufficient evidence to link the three defenders to any of the alleged offences. The investigation and surveillance occurred when they were working in their different fields to shed light on the massacres of people of different nationalities uncovered in August 2012 and April 2011 in San Fernando, Tamaulipas.
Although the investigation and surveillance date from 2016, it is not known whether they are both still ongoing. This uncertainty, which has persisted for eight years, has put the three human rights defenders in a situation of defencelessness, given the constant threat of continued unlawful use of the justice system and investigation without basic standards of due process being guaranteed.
“Amnesty International has voiced concern on several occasions regarding the serious human rights crisis unfolding in Mexico. In this context, the case of Ana Lorena, Marcela and Mercedes is emblematic of how the Mexican state makes arbitrary use of the criminal justice system to persecute, intimidate and criminalize human rights defenders”, said Edith Olivares Ferreto, Executive Director at Amnesty International Mexico.
In this context, the case of Ana Lorena, Marcela and Mercedes is emblematic of how the Mexican state makes arbitrary use of the criminal justice system
Edith Olivares Ferreto, Executive Director at Amnesty International Mexico.
to persecute, intimidate and criminalize
human rights defenders.
“With this type of persecution, the Mexican authorities are instilling fear not only in these three women defenders, but also in other human rights defenders who have every right to contribute through their work to the protection of human rights. It is inconceivable that anyone should be criminally prosecuted as a result of these efforts. The three levels of government have an obligation to ensure that human rights are upheld and not to deepen impunity,” Edith Olivares Ferreto said.
It is inconceivable that anyone should be criminally prosecuted as a result of these efforts. The three levels of government have an obligation to ensure that human rights are upheld and not to deepen impunity.
Edith Olivares Ferreto, Executive Director at Amnesty International Mexico.
The authorities carrying out the investigation and surveillance belong to what was formerly the Deputy Attorney General’s Office for Special Investigation into Organized Crime (Subprocuraduría Especializada en Investigación de Delincuencia Organizada, SEIDO) of the Attorney General’s Office (Procuraduría General de la República, PGR) and is now the Specialized Prosecutor’s Office on Organized Crime (Fiscalía Especializada en Materia de Delincuencia Organizada, FEMDO) of the Public Prosecutor’s Office (Fiscalía General de la República, FGR), with authorization at the highest level of the then PGR.
To date, no public officials have been investigated for the alleged human rights violations detailed in the Amnesty International report.
The report Persecuted: criminalization of women human rights defenders in Mexico documents how SEIDO staff diverted resources from the investigation into one of the most serious cases of human rights violations, the “San Fernando mass graves” or “San Fernando II”, to carry out surveillance on the three human rights defenders.
To take legal action against these three defenders, the SEIDO made unfounded use of legislation on kidnapping and organized crime to improperly request communications records of the women.
The SEIDO obtained information on the contacts and whereabouts of the three human rights defenders. It also improperly requested and obtained the women’s personal data to analyse their signatures. All of these actions were taken without complying with the formalities required by law, in particular the lack of a judicial order.
It is important to note that Ana Lorena, Marcela and Mercedes were investigated and subjected to surveillance as part of the preliminary investigations into the San Fernando mass graves case, under volume 221 of the relevant case file.
Officials from the SEIDO conducted an investigation without any of the three women being indicted. Moreover, they were not informed of the accusations made against them, nor of what they were being investigated for.
The investigation and surveillance against Ana Lorena, Marcela and Mercedes constituted a violation of their rights to privacy, freedom of expression, defence of human rights, non-discrimination and due process. None of the three have received justice or full reparation for the harm caused to them. In addition, they have suffered serious physical, personal, psychological and professional consequences.
But there is yet another grievance added to all of this. The National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) closed the complaint filed by the defenders without a detailed and accurate analysis of the human rights violations, and only reopened the complaint after the women filed an injunction and multiple appeals before this institution.
It is also important to note that, while the criminal justice system has been used against the three women human rights defenders, the serious human rights violations committed against people of different nationalities in San Fernando, Tamaulipas, continue to go unpunished: to date, not a single person has been convicted of these deplorable acts.
Amnesty International Mexico’s investigation includes several recommendations for the Public Prosecutor’s Office. These include the following:
For further information or to arrange an interview, contact press@amnesty.org
Tags: MEXICO, HUMAN RIGHTS, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
Love is the driving force behind the cries
Where is the promised protection? Journalists in Mexico threatened by state
Seven stories of strength and hope to commemorate this 8th March
‘They ignored me and decided to withdraw my bodyguards’
Me hicieron caso omiso y se toma la decisión que me iban a retirar las escoltas”